AN URBANIZING SPECIES
Chapter 9. Redesigning Cities for People
Lester R. Brown, Eco-Economy: Building an Economy for the Earth
(W.W. Norton & Co., NY: 2001).
Agriculture set the stage for the formation
of cities. Advances in agricultural productivity that came with
the beginning of irrigation some 6,000 years ago in the fertile
soils of the Euphrates Basin freed up people to create the first
cities. Several thousand years later the Industrial Revolution gave
cities another boost. The early factories required a concentration
of workers not possible in rural communities. The evolution of cities
is tied to advances in transportinitially
ships and trains, then motor vehicles. It was the internal combustion
engine, combined with cheap oil, that provided the mobility of people
and of freight that fueled the phenomenal growth of cities during
the twentieth century.
Although the first cities were formed several thousand years ago,
the urbanization of world population has been concentrated in the
last half-century. In 1950, an estimated 750 million people lived
in cities. By 2000, this number had climbed to 2.9 billion, nearly
a fourfold increase. The United Nations predicts that by 2050 more
than two thirds of us will be living in cities.4
Cities have been at the center of the evolution of modern civilization.
It is probably not a coincidence that the first written language
apparently evolved in the earliest cities. At the beginning of the
Christian era, there were already several great cities: Athens,
Alexandria, and Rome. A list of the world's 10 most populous cities
in selected years since then tells us much about history, the rise
and decline of civilizations, the growth and disintegration of empires,
industrialization, and, more recently, wide population growth variations
among countries. (See Table 9-1.)
In the year 1000, the world's 10 largest cities were widely dispersed
throughout the Old World. But by 1900, a century after the Industrial
Revolution began, nearly all the large cities were in the industrial
west. In 2000, after a century of record population growthmost
of it concentrated in the Third World7
of the top 10 were in developing countries.
People living in cities impose a disproportionately heavy burden
on the earth's ecosystems simply because so many resources must
be concentrated in urban areas to satisfy residents' daily needs.
Vast quantities of food and water must be moved into cities, and
the resulting concentration of human waste must then be dispersed.
The industries that take advantage of the labor force in cities
require raw materials. These, too, must be transported, often over
long distances. Finished goods must then be shipped to markets within
the country and, as globalization proceeds, other parts of the world.
The early cities relied heavily on food and water resources in the
surrounding countryside. But today cities often depend on distant
sources even for such basic amenities as food and water. Los Angeles,
for example, draws much of its water supply from the Colorado River,
some 970 kilometers (600 miles) away. Mexico City's burgeoning population,
living at 3,000 meters, must now depend on the costly pumping of
water from 150 kilometers away and a kilometer or more lower in
altitude to augment its inadequate water supplies. Water-starved
Beijing is contemplating drawing water from the Yangtze River basin
nearly 1,500 kilometers away.5
Food comes from even greater distances, as is illustrated by Tokyo,
whose population exceeds that of the world's 10 largest cities in
1900 combined. While Tokyo still depends for its rice on the highly
productive farmers in Japan, with their land vigorously protected
by government policy, its wheat comes largely from the Great Plains
of the United States and Canada and from Australia. Its corn supply
comes largely from the U.S. Midwest. Soybeans in Tokyo come from
the U.S. Midwest and the Brazilian cerrado.6
Many cities today are linked more tightly to each other than to
their own countryside. Air travel ties cities together, often making
it easier to get to a city in another country than to the more remote
rural regions within the same country. The trading of goods and
services now occurs proportionately more among cities than between
cities and the surrounding countryside.
It is widely assumed that urbanization will continue. But this is
not necessarily so. If the world is facing water scarcity, the availability
and cost of transporting water over long distances may itself begin
to constrain urban growth. Beyond this, a future of water scarcity
is almost certainly also a future of food scarcity, since 70 percent
of all the water pumped from underground and diverted from rivers
is used for irrigation. (See Chapter 7.)7
In a world of land and water scarcity, the value of both may increase
substantially, shifting the terms of trade between the countryside
and cities. Ever since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution,
the terms of trade have favored cities because they control capital
and technology, the scarce resources. But if land and water become
the scarcest resources, then the people in rural areas who control
them may have the upper hand. If so, the terms of trade could even
reverse urbanization in some situations.
Beyond resource shortages, the evolution of the Internet, which
is changing how we think about such basic parameters as distance
and mobility, could also affect urbanization. The availability of
e-mail and the potential for telecommuting may reduce the advantages
of living in the city. Cultural amenities, such as museums, once
found only in cities may now be toured over the Internet, further
diminishing the draw to urban life. Internet commerce, offering
more options than any shopping mall, may also lessen the role of
urban centers as supply sources for a wide variety of goods and
services.
Table 9-1. Population of World's 10 Largest
Metropolitan Areas in 1000, 1900, and 2000 |
City |
1000 |
City |
1900 |
City |
2000 |
|
(million) |
|
(million) |
|
(million) |
Cordova |
0.45 |
London |
6.5 |
Tokyo |
26.4 |
Kaifeng |
0.40 |
New York |
4.2 |
Mexico City |
18.1 |
Constantinople |
0.30 |
Paris |
3.3 |
Mumbai (Bombay) |
18.1 |
Angkor |
0.20 |
Berlin |
2.7 |
Sao Paulo |
17.8 |
Kyoto |
0.18 |
Chicago |
1.7 |
New York |
16.6 |
Cairo |
0.14 |
Vienna |
1.7 |
Lagos |
13.4 |
Bagdad |
0.13 |
Tokyo |
1.5 |
Los Angeles |
13.1 |
Nishapur |
0.13 |
St. Petersburg |
1.4 |
Calcutta |
12.9 |
Hasa |
0.11 |
Manchester |
1.4 |
Shanghai |
12.9 |
Anhilvada |
0.10 |
Philadelphia |
1.4 |
Buenos Aires |
12.6 |
|
Source: Molly O'Meara Sheehan,
Reinventing Cities for People and the Planet, Worldwatch
Paper 147 (Washiington, DC): Worldwatch Institute, June 1999),
pp 14-15, with updates from United Nations, World Urbanization
Prospects: The 1999 Revision (New York: 2000). |
ENDNOTES:
4.
United Nations, op. cit. note 1.
5. Los Angeles from Sandra Postel, Last Oasis, rev. ed. (New York:
W.W. Norton & Company, 1997), p. 20; Mexico City from Joel Simon,
Endangered Mexico (San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books, 1997);
Beijing from "State to Minimize Adverse Effects of Water Diversion,"
China Daily, 8 March 2001, and from "Water More Precious than Ever,"
China Daily, 14 March 2001.
6. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Foreign Agricultural Service,
Grain: World Markets and Trade, and Oilseeds: World Markets and
Trade (Washington, DC: various issues).
7. Figure of 70 percent from I.A. Shiklomanov, "World Fresh Water
Resources," in Peter H. Gleick, ed., Water in Crisis: A Guide to
the World's Fresh Water Resources (New York: Oxford University Press,
1993).
Copyright
© 2001 Earth Policy Institute
|
|